Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739737›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2018

Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website.

Anne Williams, Ellie Fossey, John Farhall, Fiona Foley, Neil Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital narratology for people with psychosis experience.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-6173
Ellie FosseyLiving with a Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-5763
John FarhallDepartment of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2830
Fiona FoleyCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1731-2599
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-6361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital interventions offer an innovative way to make the experiences of people living with mental illness available to others. As part of the Self-Management And Recovery Technology (SMART) research program on the use of digital resources in mental health services, an interactive website was developed including videos of people with lived experience of mental illness discussing their recovery. These peer videos were designed to be watched on a tablet device with a mental health worker, or independently.

objectiveOur aim was to explore how service users experienced viewing the lived experience videos on this interactive website, as well as its influence on their recovery journey.

methodsIn total, 36 service users with experience of using the website participated in individual semistructured qualitative interviews. All participants had experience of psychosis. Data analysis occurred alongside data collection, following principles of constructivist grounded theory methodology.

resultsAccording to participants, engaging with lived experience videos was a pivotal experience of using the website. Participants engaged with peers through choosing and watching the videos and reflecting on their own experience in discussions that opened up with a mental health worker. Benefits of seeing others talking about their experience included "being inspired," "knowing I'm not alone," and "believing recovery is possible." Experiences of watching the videos were influenced by the participants' intrapersonal context, particularly their ways of coping with life and use of technology. The interpersonal context of watching the videos with a worker, who guided website use and facilitated reflection, enriched the experience.

conclusionsEngaging with lived experience videos was powerful for participants, contributing to their feeling connected and hopeful. Making websites with lived experience video content available to service users and mental health workers demonstrates strong potential to support service users' recovery.

Indexed as

mental health recoverymental health servicespsychotic disordersqualitative researchschizophreniatelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29739737
PMCPMC5964305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.