Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739438›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.

C Muszynski, T Happillon, K Azudin, J-B Tylcz, D Istrate, C Marque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IDENTIFICATION OF UTERINE CONTRACTIONS BY AN ENSEMBLE OF GAUSSIAN PROCESSES.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C MuszynskiSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France. muszynski.charles@chu-amiens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1583-7148
T HappillonSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France.
K AzudinSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France.
J-B TylczSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France.
D IstrateSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France.
C MarqueSorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, BMBI UMR 7338, 60200, Compiègne, France.
Université de Technologie de Compiègne · FR

Funding

BPI FRance DOS0041193/00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is a major public health problem in developed countries. In this context, we have conducted research into outpatient monitoring of uterine electrical activity in women at risk of preterm delivery. The objective of this preliminary study was to perform automated detection of uterine contractions (without human intervention or tocographic signal, TOCO) by processing the EHG recorded on the abdomen of pregnant women. The feasibility and accuracy of uterine contraction detection based on EHG processing were tested and compared to expert decision using external tocodynamometry (TOCO) .

methodsThe study protocol was approved by local Ethics Committees under numbers ID-RCB 2016-A00663-48 for France and VSN 02-0006-V2 for Iceland. Two populations of women were included (threatened preterm birth and labour) in order to test our system of recognition of the various types of uterine contractions. EHG signal acquisition was performed according to a standardized protocol to ensure optimal reproducibility of EHG recordings. A system of 18 Ag/AgCl surface electrodes was used by placing 16 recording electrodes between the woman's pubis and umbilicus according to a 4 × 4 matrix. TOCO was recorded simultaneously with EHG recording. EHG signals were analysed in real-time by calculation of the nonlinear correlation coefficient H

resultsThe EHG database contained 51 recordings from pregnant women, with a total of 501 contractions previously labelled by analysis of the corresponding tocographic recording. The percentage recognitions obtained by application of the method based on coefficient H

conclusionThese preliminary results appear to be encouraging for monitoring of uterine contractions by algorithm-based automated detection to process the electrohysterographic signal (EHG). This compact recording system, based on the use of surface electrodes attached to the skin, appears to be particularly suitable for outpatient monitoring of uterine contractions, possibly at home, allowing telemonitoring of pregnancies. One of the advantages of EHG processing is that useful information concerning contraction efficiency can be extracted from this signal, which is not possible with the TOCO signal.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAutomationElectromyographyFalse Positive ReactionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedUterine ContractionUterine MonitoringUterusAutomated contraction detectionElectrohysterogramPremature deliveryUterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID29739438
PMCPMC5941683
OpenAlexW2805465171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.