Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739393›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2018

Involvement in decisions about intravenous treatment for nursing home patients: nursing homes versus hospital wards.

Kristin Klomstad, Reidar Pedersen, Reidun Førde, Maria Romøren

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01023763 (Can a Structured Training Program in Intravenous Treatment of Infections in Nursing Homes Lead to a Better Patient Trajectory and Reduced Hospital Admittance?), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01023763 phase2completednot on this map

Can a Structured Training Program in Intravenous Treatment of Infections in Nursing Homes Lead to a Better Patient Trajectory and Reduced Hospital Admittance?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2009 to 2012Enrolled330ConditionsInfections, DehydrationArmsA structured training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristin KlomstadCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Reidar PedersenCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Reidun FørdeCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Maria RomørenCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. maria.romoren@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-0025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany of the elderly in nursing homes are very ill and have a reduced quality of life. Life expectancy is often hard to predict. Decisions about life-prolonging treatment should be based on a professional assessment of the patient's best interest, assessment of capacity to consent, and on the patient's own wishes. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare how these types of decisions were made in nursing homes and in hospital wards.

methodsUsing a questionnaire, we studied the decision-making process for 299 nursing home patients who were treated for dehydration using intravenous fluids, or for bacterial infections using intravenous antibiotics. We compared the 215 (72%) patients treated in nursing homes to the 84 (28%) nursing home patients treated in the hospital.

resultsThe patients' capacity to consent was considered prior to treatment in 197 (92%) of the patients treated in nursing homes and 56 (67%) of the patients treated in hospitals (p < 0.001). The answers indicate that capacity to consent can be difficult to assess. Patients that were considered capable to consent, were more often involved in the decision-making in nursing homes than in hospital (90% vs. 52%). Next of kin and other health personnel were also more rarely involved when the nursing home patient was treated in hospital. Whether advance care planning had been carried out, was more often unknown in the hospital (69% vs. 17% in nursing homes). Hospital doctors expressed more doubt about the decision to admit the patient to the hospital than about the treatment itself.

conclusionsThis study indicates a potential for improvement in decision-making processes in general, and in particular when nursing home patients are treated in a hospital ward. The findings corroborate that nursing home patients should be treated locally if adequate health care and treatment is available. The communication between the different levels of health care when hospitalization is necessary, must be better.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01023763 (12/1/09) [The registration was delayed one month after study onset due to practical reasons].

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDecision MakingHomes for the AgedHospitalsLife Support CareNursing HomesPatient ParticipationAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFamilyFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental CompetencyAdvance care planningDecision making capacityElderlyEnd-of-life decisionsEthicsHospitalLife prolonging treatmentNext of kinNursing homePatient autonomy

Identifiers

PMID29739393
PMCPMC5941318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.