Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739369›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Increasing advance personal planning: the need for action at the community level.

Amy Waller, Rob Sanson-Fisher, Nola Ries, Jamie Bryant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Part of the solution: A survey of community organisation perspectives on barriers and facilitating actions to Advance Care Planning in British Columbia, Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  9. 'Palliative medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy WallerHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. amy.waller@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-9424
Rob Sanson-FisherHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Nola RiesFaculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Jamie BryantHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council 150101262The Cancer Council NSW CSR 11-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance personal planning is the process by which people consider, document and communicate their preferences for personal, financial and health matters in case they lose the ability to make decisions or express their wishes in the future. DISCUSSION: Advance personal planning is most often undertaken by individuals who are seriously ill, often in the context of a medical crisis and/or at the time of admission to hospital. However, the clinical utility and legal validity of the planning process may be compromised in these circumstances. Patients may lack sufficient capacity to meaningfully engage in advance personal planning; there may be insufficient time to adequately reflect on and discuss wishes with key others; and there may also be limited opportunity for inter-professional input and collaboration in the process. Here, we propose an agenda for research to advance the science of advance personal planning by promoting a 'whole community' approach. Adoption of advance personal planning at a community level may be achieved using a variety of strategies including public media campaigns, intervening with professionals across a range of health care and legal settings, and mobilising support from influential groups and local government. One potentially promising method for encouraging earlier adoption of advance personal planning among a broader population involves a community action approach, whereby multiple evidence-based strategies are integrated across multiple access points. Community action involves calling on community members, professionals, community and/or government organisations to work collaboratively to design and systematically implement intervention strategies with the aim of bringing about desired behaviour change. An example of a community action trial to improving uptake and quality of advance personal planning is described.

conclusionWhile promising, there is a need for rigorous evidence to demonstrate whether a community action approach is effective in establishing whole community adoption of advance personal planning.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAdvance Care PlanningHumansAdvance care planningAdvance personal planningCapacityCommunity actionEnd-of-life

Identifiers

PMID29739369
PMCPMC5941331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.