Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739351›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Expectant fathers' participation in antenatal care services in Papua New Guinea: a qualitative inquiry.

Jessica Davis, Cathy Vaughan, Justine Nankinga, Lisa Davidson, Hellen Kigodi, Eileen Alalo, Liz Comrie-Thomson, Stanley Luchters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Male partner participation in maternity care and social support for childbearing women: a discussion paper.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica DavisBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. jessica.davis@burnet.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-8961
Cathy VaughanMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Justine NankingaUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Papua New Guinea Country Office, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Lisa DavidsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hellen KigodiBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eileen AlaloCatholic Church Health Services, Mingende, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Liz Comrie-ThomsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stanley LuchtersBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of engaging men in maternal and child health programs is well recognised internationally. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), men's involvement in maternal and child health services remains limited and barriers and enablers to involving fathers in antenatal care have not been well studied. The purpose of this paper is to explore attitudes to expectant fathers participating in antenatal care, and to identify barriers and enablers to men's participation in antenatal care with their pregnant partner in PNG.

methodsTwenty-eight focus group discussions were conducted with purposively selected pregnant women, expectant fathers, older men and older women across four provinces of PNG. Fourteen key informant interviews were also conducted with health workers. Qualitative data generated were analysed thematically.

resultsWhile some men accompany their pregnant partners to the antenatal clinic and wait outside, very few men participate in antenatal consultations. Factors supporting fathers' participation in antenatal consultations included feelings of shared responsibility for the unborn child, concern for the mother's or baby's health, the child being a first child, friendly health workers, and male health workers. Sociocultural norms and taboos were the most significant barrier to fathers' participation in antenatal care, contributing to men feeling ashamed or embarrassed to attend clinic with their partner. Other barriers to men's participation included fear of HIV or sexually transmitted infection testing, lack of separate waiting spaces for men, rude treatment by health workers, and being in a polygamous relationship. Building community awareness of the benefits of fathers participating in maternal and child health service, inviting fathers to attend antenatal care if their pregnant partner would like them to, and ensuring clinic spaces and staff are welcoming to men were strategies suggested for increasing fathers' participation in antenatal care.

conclusionThis study identified significant sociocultural and health service barriers to expectant fathers' participation in antenatal care in PNG. Our findings highlight the need to address these barriers - through health staff training and support, changes to health facility layout and community awareness raising - so that couples in PNG can access the benefits of men's participation in antenatal care.

Indexed as

AttitudePrenatal CareAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCultureEmbarrassmentFathersFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Facility EnvironmentHumansMaleMarriageMiddle AgedPapua New GuineaAntenatalEngaging menMale involvementMaternal healthPapua New GuineaQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29739351
PMCPMC5941321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.