Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29739349›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

What is the result of vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine during labour on maternal and neonatal infections? A systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis.

Charlotte Bell, Laura Hughes, Trevor Akister, Vin Ramkhelawon, Amie Wilson, David Lissauer

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte BellSouth Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Lakin Road, Warwick, CV34 5BW, UK. charlotte.bell@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-9352
Laura HughesWye Valley NHS Trust, The County Hospital, Hereford, HR1 2BN, UK.
Trevor AkisterSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Vin RamkhelawonSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Amie WilsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
David LissauerInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, UK.
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBCounty Hospital · GBSouth Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with vaginal microorganisms during labour can lead to maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. The objective of this systematic review is to review the effectiveness of intrapartum vaginal chlorhexidine in the reduction of maternal and neonatal colonisation and infectious morbidity.

methodsSearch strategy - Eight databases were searched for articles published in any language from inception to October 2016. Selection criteria - Randomised controlled trials were included. Data Collection and analysis - Publications were assessed for inclusion. Data were extracted and assessed for risk of bias. Relative risks from individual studies were pooled using a random effects model and the heterogeneity of treatment was evaluated using Chi

resultsEleven randomised controlled trials (n = 20,101) evaluated intrapartum vaginal chlorhexidine interventions. Meta-analysis found no significant differences between the intervention and control groups for any of the four outcomes: maternal or neonatal colonization or infection. The preferred method for chlorhexidine administration was vaginal irrigation.

conclusionsMeta-analysis did not demonstrate improved maternal or neonatal outcomes with intrapartum vaginal chlorhexidine cleansing, however this may be due to the limitations of the available studies. A larger, multicentre randomised controlled trial, powered to accurately evaluate the effect of intrapartum vaginal chlorhexidine cleansing on neonatal outcomes may still be informative; the technique of douching may be the most promising.

Indexed as

Vaginal DouchingAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBacterial InfectionsCarrier StateChlorhexidineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLabor, ObstetricPeripartum PeriodPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisVaginaAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineChlorhexidineInfectionInfection preventionMaternalNeonatalSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29739349
PMCPMC5941653
OpenAlexW2805561201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.