Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29737418›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

Towards a Clinical Trial Protocol to Evaluate Health Information Systems: Evaluation of a Computerized System for Monitoring Tuberculosis from a Patient Perspective in Brazil.

Nathalia Yukie Crepaldi, Inacia Bezerra de Lima, Fernanda Bergamini Vicentine, Lídia Maria Lourençon Rodrigues, Tiago Lara Michelin Sanches, Antonio Ruffino-Netto, Domingos Alves, Rui Pedro Charters Lopes Rijo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalia Yukie CrepaldiDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil. nathaliayc@gmail.com.
Inacia Bezerra de LimaIntelligence Laboratory in Health, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Fernanda Bergamini VicentineDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Lídia Maria Lourençon RodriguesDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Tiago Lara Michelin SanchesIntelligence Laboratory in Health, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Antonio Ruffino-NettoDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Domingos AlvesDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
Rui Pedro Charters Lopes RijoIntelligence Laboratory in Health, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.068176/2014-01Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.137749/2017-00Ministério da Saúde 796767/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of health information systems consider different aspects of the system itself. They focus or on the professional who will use the software or on its usability or on the software engineering metrics or on financial and managerial issues. The existent approaches are very resources consuming, disconnected, and not standardized. As the software becomes more critical in the health organizations and in patients, becoming used as a medical device or a medicine, there is an urgency to identify tools and methods that can be applied in the development process. The present work is one of the steps of a broader study to identify standardized protocols to evaluate the health information systems as medicines and medical devices are evaluated by clinical trials. The goal of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the introduction of an information system for monitoring tuberculosis treatment (SISTB) in a Brazilian municipality from the patients' perspective. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems were answered by the patients before and after the SISTB introduction, for comparison. Patients from an outpatient clinic, formed the control group, that is, at this site was not implanted the SISTB. Descriptive statistics and mixed effects model were used for data analysis. Eighty-eight interviews were conducted in the study. The questionnaire's results presented better averages after the system introduction but were not considered statistically significant. Therefore, it was not possible to associate system implantation with improved patient satisfaction. The HIS evaluation need be complete, the technical and managerial evaluation, the safety, the impact on the professionals and direct and/or indirect impact on patients are important. Developing the right tools and methods that can evaluate the software in its entirety, from the beginning of the development cycle with a normalized scale, are needed.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsPatient SatisfactionAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAntitubercular AgentsBrazilDirectly Observed TherapyFemaleHealth Information SystemsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementResearch DesignSocioeconomic FactorsSoftware DesignAntitubercular AgentsHealth information system evaluationPatient relationship managementPatient satisfactionTuberculosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.