Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29737378›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Trunk, head and pelvis interactions in healthy children when performing seated daily arm tasks.

L H C Peeters, I Kingma, G S Faber, J H van Dieën, I J M de Groot

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L H C PeetersDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. laura.hc.peeters@radboudumc.nl.
I KingmaDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G S FaberDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J H van DieënDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I J M de GrootDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 13524Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 13525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of trunk and head supportive devices for children with neuromuscular disorders requires detailed information about pelvis, trunk and head movement in interaction with upper extremity movement, as these are crucial for daily activities when seated in a wheelchair. Twenty-five healthy subjects (6-20 years old) were included to obtain insight in the physiological interactions between these segments and to assess maturation effects. Subjects performed a maximum range of trunk and head movement tasks and several daily tasks, including forward and lateral reaching. Movements of the arms, head, pelvis, and sub-sections of the trunk were recorded with an optical motion capture system. The range of motion of each segment was calculated. Contributions of individual trunk segments to the range of trunk motion varied with movement direction and therefore with the task performed. Movement of pelvis and all trunk segments in the sagittal plane increased significantly with reaching height, distance and object weight when reaching forward and lateral. Trunk movement in reaching decreased with age. Head movement was opposite to trunk movement in the sagittal (> 50% of the subjects) and transverse planes (> 75% of the subjects) and was variable in the frontal plane in most tasks. Both trunk and head movement onsets were earlier compared to arm movement onset. These results provide insight in the role of the upper body in arm tasks in young subjects and can be used for the design of trunk and head supportive devices for children with neuromuscular disorders.

Indexed as

Self-Help DevicesSitting PositionAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHeadHumansMaleMovementPelvisPostureRange of Motion, ArticularStatistics, NonparametricTorsoYoung AdultCoordinationHeadKinematicsReachingSittingTrunk

Identifiers

PMID29737378
PMCPMC6010485
OpenAlexW2800341653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.