Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29737244›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2018

The development of specialized palliative care in the community: A qualitative study of the evolution of 15 teams.

Hsien Seow, Daryl Bainbridge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hsien Seow1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Daryl Bainbridge1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-8229
Juravinski Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR 115112CIHR 148997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional specialized palliative care teams at home improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and support many patients to die at home. However, practical details about how to develop home-based teams in different regions and health systems are scarce.

aimTo examine how a variety of home-based specialized palliative care teams created and grew their team over time and to identify critical steps in their evolution.

designA qualitative study was designed based on a grounded theory approach, using semi-structured interviews and other documentation. SETTING/

participantsIn all, 15 specialized palliative care teams from Ontario, Canada, representing rural and urban areas. Data were collected from core members of the teams, including nurses, physicians, personal support workers, spiritual counselors, and administrators.

resultsIn all, 122 individuals where interviewed, ranging from 4 to 10 per team. The analysis revealed four stages in team evolution: Inception, Start-up (n = 4 teams), Growth (n = 5), and Mature (n = 6). In the Inception stage, a champion provider was required to leverage existing resources to form the team. Start-up teams were testing and adjusting care processes to solidify their presence in the community. Growth teams had core expertise, relationships with fellow providers, and 24/7 support. Mature teams were fully integrated in the community, but still engaged in continuous quality improvement.

conclusionUnderstanding the developmental stages of teams can help to inform the progress of other community-based teams. Appropriate outcome measures at each stage are also critical for team motivation and steady progress.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPalliative CareProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchTerminal Carecapacity buildinghome care servicesPalliative carepatient care team community health servicesqualitative researchterminal care

Identifiers

PMID29737244
PMCPMC6041761
OpenAlexW2800759793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.