ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2018
A tutorial on model informed approaches to cardiovascular safety with focus on cardiac repolarisation.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Multifaceted Problems Associated with Dysrhythmia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Concentration-QT modelling shows no evidence of clinically significant QT interval prolongation with capivasertib at expected therapeutic concentrations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Antiepileptic Drug Tiagabine Does Not Directly Target Key Cardiac Ion Channels Kv11.1, Nav1.5 and Cav1.2.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- On the potential of in vitro organ-chip models to define temporal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drugs can affect the cardiovascular (CV) system either as an intended treatment or as an unwanted side effect. In both cases, drug-induced cardiotoxicities such as arrhythmia and unfavourable hemodynamic effects can occur, and be described using mathematical models; such a model informed approach can provide valuable information during drug development and can aid decision-making. However, in order to develop informative models, it is vital to understand CV physiology. The aims of this tutorial are to present (1) key background biological and medical aspects of the CV system, (2) CV electrophysiology, (3) CV safety concepts, (4) practical aspects of development of CV models and (5) regulatory expectations with a focus on using model informed and quantitative approaches to support nonclinical and clinical drug development. In addition, we share several case studies to provide practical information on project strategy (planning, key questions, assumptions setting, and experimental design) and mathematical models development that support decision-making during drug discovery and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29736890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.