ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018
Automatic segmentation of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes post-implantation considering bending.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping white matter tracts with SEEG electrodes.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Stereoelectroencephalography for drug resistant epilepsy: precision and complications in stepwise improvement of frameless implantation.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Signal acquisition of brain-computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Previous, current, and future stereotactic EEG techniques for localising epileptic foci.Expert review of medical devices · 2022Review
- Generation of synthetic training data for SEEG electrodes segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Computational modeling of seizure spread on a cortical surface.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Modeling intracranial electrodes. A simulation platform for the evaluation of localization algorithms.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Validation of semi-automated anatomically labeled SEEG contacts in a brain atlas for mapping connectivity in focal epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2021Article
- Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- LeGUI: A Fast and Accurate Graphical User Interface for Automated Detection and Anatomical Localization of Intracranial Electrodes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Gray Matter Sampling Differences Between Subdural Electrodes and Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Automated computation and analysis of accuracy metrics in stereoencephalography.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Automation Advances in Stereoelectroencephalography Planning.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Comparison of interactive and automatic segmentation of stereoelectroencephalography electrodes on computed tomography post-operative images: preliminary results.Healthcare technology letters · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe accurate and automatic localisation of SEEG electrodes is crucial for determining the location of epileptic seizure onset. We propose an algorithm for the automatic segmentation of electrode bolts and contacts that accounts for electrode bending in relation to regional brain anatomy.
methodsCo-registered post-implantation CT, pre-implantation MRI, and brain parcellation images are used to create regions of interest to automatically segment bolts and contacts. Contact search strategy is based on the direction of the bolt with distance and angle constraints, in addition to post-processing steps that assign remaining contacts and predict contact position. We measured the accuracy of contact position, bolt angle, and anatomical region at the tip of the electrode in 23 post-SEEG cases comprising two different surgical approaches when placing a guiding stylet close to and far from target point. Local and global bending are computed when modelling electrodes as elastic rods.
resultsOur approach executed on average in 36.17 s with a sensitivity of 98.81% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.01%. Compared to manual segmentation, the position of contacts had a mean absolute error of 0.38 mm and the mean bolt angle difference of [Formula: see text] resulted in a mean displacement error of 0.68 mm at the tip of the electrode. Anatomical regions at the tip of the electrode were in strong concordance with those selected manually by neurosurgeons, [Formula: see text], with average distance between regions of 0.82 mm when in disagreement. Our approach performed equally in two surgical approaches regardless of the amount of electrode bending.
conclusionWe present a method robust to electrode bending that can accurately segment contact positions and bolt orientation. The techniques presented in this paper will allow further characterisation of bending within different brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.