Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29736794›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients.

Julia Brütting, Lydia Reinhardt, Maike Bergmann, Dirk Schadendorf, Christiane Weber, Wolfgang Tilgen, Carola Berking, Friedegund Meier, NVKH

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One Website to Gather them All: Usability Testing of the New German SKin Cancer INFOrmation (SKINFO) Website-A Mixed-methods Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia BrüttingDepartment of Dermatology, Dresden University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. julia.bruetting@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-8672
Lydia ReinhardtDepartment of Dermatology, Dresden University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Maike BergmannDepartment of Dermatology, Dresden University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christiane WeberDermatological Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Wolfgang TilgenSteering Group, Skin Cancer Counsil Germany, Neckargemünd, Germany.
Carola BerkingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Friedegund MeierDepartment of Dermatology, Dresden University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
NVKH

Funding

German Skin Cancer Foundation HF4-P03-Z11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Booklets are the preferably used form among patient education materials and are often handed out during medical consultations in dermatological oncology settings. However, little is known about how beneficial they are and whether they correspond to essential quality characteristics. To assess the quality, readability, and understandability of currently freely available booklets written in German addressing melanoma patients (MP). Melanoma booklets in accordance with predefined criteria were searched and analyzed. Three reviewers independently assessed their quality and understandability by applying the DISCERN tool and PEMAT-P. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) was calculated to determine readability. Nine booklets addressing MP were analyzed. The overall median DISCERN score was 3.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.9-4.1), median PEMAT-P score was 91% (IQR 83-94.5), and median FRES was 43 (IQR 33.5-47.5), indicating a medium quality, a high application of understandability elements, but low readability in at least half of the booklets. Incomplete reporting on treatments and insufficient meta-information caused the main quality deficits. There is a need of content and didactic revision of German booklets for MP to raise their quality and to make them beneficial and understandable for more patients. An adaption in accordance with evidence-based criteria and an even stronger involvement of MP in assessment and development of patient education material are considered to be the best approaches.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyLanguagePamphletsReadingVocabularyComprehensionGermanyHumansInformation DisseminationMelanomaPatient Education as TopicTeaching MaterialsBookletsHealth communicationInformation disseminationMelanomaPatient educationQualitative evaluationReadability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.