ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2018
Brain mechanisms involved in angry prosody change detection in school-age children and adults, revealed by electrophysiology.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02160119 (Emotional and Change-related Attention in Autism), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Emotional and Change-related Attention in Autism
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acoustic Features of Emotional Vocalizations Account for Early Modulations of Event-Related Brain Potentials.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Processing Emotional Speech Prosody: Preliminary Findings from a Multi-Feature Oddball Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Habituation, Adaptation and Prediction Processes in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Children's inhibition skills are associated with their P3a latency-results from an exploratory study.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2022Article
- Emotional expression visual mismatch negativity in children.Developmental psychobiology · 2022Article
- Brain correlates of emotional prosodic change detection in autism spectrum disorder.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2020Article
- Emotional prosodic change detection in autism Spectrum disorder: an electrophysiological investigation in children and adults.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voices transmit social signals through speech and/or prosody. Emotional prosody conveys key information about the emotional state of a speaker and is thus a crucial cue that one has to detect in order to develop efficient social communication. Previous studies in adults reported different brain responses to emotional than to neutral prosodic deviancy. The aim of this study was to characterize such specific emotional deviancy effects in school-age children. The mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a evoked potentials, reflecting automatic change detection and automatic attention orienting, respectively, were obtained for neutral and emotional angry deviants in both school-age children (n = 26) and adults (n = 14). Shorter latencies were found for emotional than for neutral preattentional responses in both groups. However, whereas this effect was observed on the MMN in adults, it appeared in an early discriminative negativity preceding the MMN in children. A smaller P3a amplitude was observed for the emotional than for the neutral deviants at all ages. Overall, the brain responses involved in specific emotional change processing are already present during childhood, but responses have not yet reached an adult pattern. We suggest that these processing differences might contribute to the known improvement of emotional prosody perception between childhood and adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.