Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29736562›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2018

Evaluation of Brain Nuclear Medicine Imaging Tracers in a Murine Model of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy.

Dávid Szöllősi, Nikolett Hegedűs, Dániel S Veres, Ildikó Futó, Ildikó Horváth, Noémi Kovács, Bernadett Martinecz, Ádám Dénes, Daniel Seifert, Ralf Bergmann and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dávid SzöllősiDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-3862
Nikolett HegedűsDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.
Dániel S VeresDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.
Ildikó FutóDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.
Ildikó HorváthDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.
Noémi KovácsCROmed Translational Research Centers, Budapest, H-1047, Hungary.
Bernadett MartineczLaboratory of Neuroimmunology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám DénesLaboratory of Neuroimmunology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Daniel SeifertNuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, CZ 250 68, Rez, Czech Republic.
Ralf BergmannHelmholz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Radiopharmazie Radiopharmaceutische Biologie, Dresden, Germany.
Ondřej LebedaNuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, CZ 250 68, Rez, Czech Republic.
Zoltán VargaDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary.
Zoltán KaletaProgressio Fine Chemical Engineering Ltd, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Krisztián SzigetiDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, H-1094, Hungary. szigeti.krisztian@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.
Domokos MáthéCROmed Translational Research Centers, Budapest, H-1047, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUCzech Academy of Sciences, Nuclear Physics Institute · CZHUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · HUMontavid Thermodynamic Research Group · HUHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate a set of widely used nuclear medicine imaging agents as possible methods to study the early effects of systemic inflammation on the living brain in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). The lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced murine systemic inflammation model was selected as a model of SAE. PROCEDURES: C57BL/6 mice were used. A multimodal imaging protocol was carried out on each animal 4 h following the intravenous administration of LPS using the following tracers: [

resultsSignificantly reduced perfusion values and significantly enhanced [

conclusionsOur results suggest that [

Indexed as

Radioactive TracersAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseIodine RadioisotopesLipopolysaccharidesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingNuclear MedicinePositron-Emission TomographyRadionuclide ImagingSepsis-Associated EncephalopathyFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseIodine-125Iodine RadioisotopesLipopolysaccharidesRadioactive TracersTechnetium Tc 99m Exametazime[125I]CLINME[125I]iomazenil[18F]FDG[99mTc]HMPAOLPSMicroglia activationNeuroinflammationPET/MRISPECT/CTSystemic infection

Identifiers

PMID29736562
PMCPMC6244542
OpenAlexW2803039969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.