Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2018
Noninferiority of
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Linker Molecules on the Biodistribution Characteristics ofACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Optimization Processes of Clinical Chelation-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Pathway-Directed Targeted Radionuclide Therapy in Oncology.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- A prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The Biodistribution and Utility ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- The Preparation and Execution of Exploratory Human Studies on NovelACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Article
- Preparation and Bioevaluation of a NovelPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Modulators of radiation-induced cardiopulmonary toxicities for non-small cell lung cancer: Integrated cytokines, single nucleotide variants, and HBP systems imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.