ArticleNature nanotechnology2018
A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues.
Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
182 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analysis of research status and trends on nano-agricultural application: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Pooled it
- Biopesticides vs conventional synthetic pesticides: A multidimensional evaluation of impacts on agricultural productivity and environmental health.Eco-Environment & Health · 2026Review
- Review
- Controlled-release herbicide spheres: co-crystallization of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid with l-menthol via green oiling-out process for low leaching and high activity.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Carbon quantum dots in plant photosynthesis: from material design to agricultural performance.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Review
- Nanoantioxidants: Structure-Activity Relationships, Redox Mechanisms, Applications, and Safety.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sustainable Nano-Fertilizers From Marine Biomass: Codium decorticatum-Mediated MgO Nanoparticles for Enhanced Legume Productivity.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Review
- Engineered nanoparticles at the redox interface: Rewiring ROS signaling and stress responses in plants.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Enzyme/pH dual-stimuli responsive prochloraz nanopesticide controlled release system for kiwifruit soft rot disease control.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Sustainable Food Security Through Nanotechnology-Based Seed Priming in Rice and Wheat.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Enabled CRISPR Delivery: Emerging Opportunities in Agriculture and Forest Biotechnology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biomass-Derived Carbon Dots from Guava Leaves Promote Rice Growth and Yield in a Dose-Dependent Manner.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mineral-doped quantum fertilizers: boron-doped carbon dots promote sustainable agriculture and bacterial disease management.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Integrated molecular and metabolomic assessment of copper hydroxide nanopesticide toxicity in zebrafish.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Enhancing the yield and berry color of crimson seedless table grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.) via zinc oxide nanoparticles integrated with molasses.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Nickel Supplementation for Enhanced Soybean Growth: A Micrometric-to-Nanometric Investigation of Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Metabolism.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology for Drought Mitigation and Water Conservation: Opportunities and Limitations.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing agroecosystems through next-generation bio-nanofertilizers: an overview toward sustainable agriculture.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among a wide range of possible applications of nanotechnology in agriculture, there has been a particular interest in developing novel nanoagrochemicals. While some concerns have been expressed regarding altered risk profile of the new products, many foresee a great potential to support the necessary increase in global food production in a sustainable way. A critical evaluation of nanoagrochemicals against conventional analogues is essential to assess the associated benefits and risks. In this assessment, recent literature was critically analysed to determine the extent to which nanoagrochemicals differ from conventional products. Our analysis was based on 78 published papers and shows that median gain in efficacy relative to conventional products is about 20-30%. Environmental fate of agrochemicals can be altered by nanoformulations, but changes may not necessarily translate in a reduction of the environmental impact. Many studies lacked nano-specific quality assurance and adequate controls. Currently, there is no comprehensive study in the literature that evaluates efficacy and environmental impact of nanoagrochemicals under field conditions. This is a crucial knowledge gap and more work will thus be necessary for a sound evaluation of the benefits and new risks that nanoagrochemicals represent relative to existing products.
Identifiers
29736032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.