Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735742›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Interplay of self-association and conformational flexibility in regulating protein function.

Michael Garton, Stephen S MacKinnon, Anatoly Malevanets, Shoshana J Wodak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates Arl4D self-interaction to promote Pak1 signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Allostery and molecular machines.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael GartonDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, The Donnelly Centre, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
Stephen S MacKinnonCyclica Inc., 18 King Street East, Suite 810, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1C4, Canada.
Anatoly MalevanetsHospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada.
Shoshana J WodakVIB Structural Biology research Centre, VUB, Building E Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium shoshana.wodak@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-6545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many functional roles have been attributed to homodimers, the most common mode of protein self-association, notably in the regulation of enzymes, ion channels, transporters and transcription factors. Here we review findings that offer new insights into the different roles conformational flexibility plays in regulating homodimer function. Intertwined homodimers of two-domain proteins and their related family members display significant conformational flexibility, which translates into concerted motion between structural domains. This flexibility enables the corresponding proteins to regulate function across family members by modulating the spatial positions of key recognition surfaces of individual domains, to either maintain subunit interfaces, alter them or break them altogether, leading to a variety of functional consequences. Many proteins may exist as monomers but carry out their biological function as homodimers or higher-order oligomers. We present early evidence that in such systems homodimer formation primes the protein for its functional role. It does so by inducing elevated mobility in protein regions corresponding to the binding epitopes of functionally important ligands. In some systems this process acts as an allosteric response elicited by the self-association reaction itself. Our analysis furthermore suggests that the induced extra mobility likely facilitates ligand binding through the mechanism of conformational selection.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Allostery and molecular machines'.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationProtein ConformationBacterial ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein BindingBacterial Proteinsallosterybackbone mobilitybinding epitopehomodimerprotein functionregulation

Identifiers

PMID29735742
PMCPMC5941183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.