Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735696›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Recurrent bridgehead effects accelerate global alien ant spread.

Cleo Bertelsmeier, Sébastien Ollier, Andrew M Liebhold, Eckehard G Brockerhoff, Darren Ward, Laurent Keller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alien ants spreading through Europe:Biodiversity data journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Historical plant introductions predict current insect invasions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The worldwide networks of spread of recorded alien species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Cleo BertelsmeierDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; cleo.bertelsmeier@unil.ch Laurent.Keller@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3624-1300
Sébastien OllierEcologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France.
Andrew M LiebholdNorthern Research Station, US Forest Service, Morgantown, WV 26505.ORCID 0000-0001-7427-6534
Eckehard G BrockerhoffForest Protection, Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute), Riccarton, Christchurch, 8440 New Zealand.
Darren WardSystematics, Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Laurent KellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; cleo.bertelsmeier@unil.ch Laurent.Keller@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-9953
University of Lausanne · CHScion · NZUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Auckland · NZUS Forest Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are a major threat to biological diversity, agriculture, and human health. To predict and prevent new invasions, it is crucial to develop a better understanding of the drivers of the invasion process. The analysis of 4,533 border interception events revealed that at least 51 different alien ant species were intercepted at US ports over a period of 70 years (1914-1984), and 45 alien species were intercepted entering New Zealand over a period of 68 years (1955-2013). Most of the interceptions did not originate from species' native ranges but instead came from invaded areas. In the United States, 75.7% of the interceptions came from a country where the intercepted ant species had been previously introduced. In New Zealand, this value was even higher, at 87.8%. There was an overrepresentation of interceptions from nearby locations (Latin America for species intercepted in the United States and Oceania for species intercepted in New Zealand). The probability of a species' successful establishment in both the United States and New Zealand was positively related to the number of interceptions of the species in these countries. Moreover, species that have spread to more continents are also more likely to be intercepted and to make secondary introductions. This creates a positive feedback loop between the introduction and establishment stages of the invasion process, in which initial establishments promote secondary introductions. Overall, these results reveal that secondary introductions act as a critical driver of increasing global rates of invasions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsAntsNew ZealandUnited Statesbiological invasionsglobalizationinvasive antspropagule pressuresecondary introductions

Identifiers

PMID29735696
PMCPMC6003495
OpenAlexW2799589516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.