Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735660›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Longevity and transposon defense, the case of termite reproductives.

Daniel Elsner, Karen Meusemann, Judith Korb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Need for shared internal mound conditions by fungus-growingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel ElsnerEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg D-79104, Germany.
Karen MeusemannEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg D-79104, Germany.
Judith KorbEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg D-79104, Germany judith.korb@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects are promising new models in aging research. Within single colonies, longevity differences of several magnitudes exist that can be found elsewhere only between different species. Reproducing queens (and, in termites, also kings) can live for several decades, whereas sterile workers often have a lifespan of a few weeks only. We studied aging in the wild in a highly social insect, the termite

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGene Expression RegulationLongevityReproductionAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIsopteraRNA, Small InterferingDNA Transposable ElementsRNA, Small Interferingagingdisposable somasocial insectstermitestransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID29735660
PMCPMC6003524
OpenAlexW2801961972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.