Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735478›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Development and Validation of a Multidisciplinary Mobile Care System for Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer: Interventional Observation Study.

Ji Yeong Soh, Won Chul Cha, Dong Kyung Chang, Ji Hye Hwang, Kihyung Kim, Miyong Rha, Hee Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Using digital technology to support wellbeing and independence among people living with incurable cancers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Supporting colorectal cancer survivors using eHealth: a systematic review and framework suggestion.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients' self-management after discharge from surgery-an integrative literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of smartphone devices in precision oncology.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ji Yeong SohSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Digital Health, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-8441
Won Chul ChaSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Digital Health, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-2992
Dong Kyung ChangSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Digital Health, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-4629
Ji Hye HwangDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8176-3354
Kihyung KimSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Digital Health, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-5133
Miyong RhaDepartment of Dietetics, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-9402
Hee KwonLifeSemantics Corp, Seoul, Republic Of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-1888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health apps have emerged as supportive tools in the management of advanced cancers. However, only a few apps have self-monitoring features, and they are not standardized and validated.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a multidisciplinary mobile care system with self-monitoring features that can be useful for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

methodsThe development of the multidisciplinary mobile health management system was divided into 3 steps. First, the service scope was set up, and the measurement tools were standardized. Second, the service flow of the mobile care system was organized. Third, the mobile app (Life Manager) was developed. The app was developed to achieve 3 major clinical goals: support for quality of life, nutrition, and rehabilitation. Three main functional themes were developed to achieve clinical goals: a to-do list, health education, and in-app chat. Thirteen clinically oriented measures were included: the modified Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire, Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), distress, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, Low anterior resection syndrome score, satisfaction rate, etc. To validate the system, a prospective observational study was conducted. Patients with gastric cancer or colon cancer undergoing chemotherapy were recruited. We followed the subjects for 12 weeks, and selected clinical measures were taken online and offline.

resultsAfter the development process, a multidisciplinary app, the Life Manager, was launched. For evaluation, 203 patients were recruited for the study, of whom 101 (49.8%) had gastric cancer, and 102 (50.2%) were receiving palliative care. Most patients were in their fifties (35.5%), and 128 (63.1%) were male. Overall, 176 subjects (86.7%) completed the study. Among subjects who dropped out, the most common reason was the change of patient's clinical condition (51.9%). During the study period, subjects received multiple health education sessions. For the gastric cancer group, the "general gastric cancer education" was most frequently viewed (322 times), and for the colon cancer group, the "warming-up exercise" was most viewed (340 times). Of 13 measurements taken from subjects, 9 were taken offline (response rate: 52.0% to 90.1%), and 3 were taken online (response rate: 17.6% to 57.4%). The overall satisfaction rate among subjects was favorable and ranged from 3.93 (SD 0.88) to 4.01 (SD 0.87) on the 5-point Likert scale.

conclusionsA multidisciplinary mobile care system for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer was developed with clinically oriented measures. A prospective study was performed for its evaluation, which showed favorable satisfaction.

Indexed as

health appsmobile care systemmobile healthmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID29735478
PMCPMC6249030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.