Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735404›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2018

Impaired Expected Value Computations Coupled With Overreliance on Stimulus-Response Learning in Schizophrenia.

Dennis Hernaus, James M Gold, James A Waltz, Michael J Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The challenge of learning adaptive mental behavior.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2024
    Article
  7. From Computation to Clinic.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reinforcement-learning in fronto-striatal circuits.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Retention of Value Representations Across Time in People With Schizophrenia and Healthy Control Subjects.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms Underlying Motivational Dysfunction in Schizophrenia.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dennis HernausMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: dhernaus@som.umaryland.edu.
James M GoldMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
James A WaltzMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael J FrankDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Clinical and Computational Studies of Dopamine Function in SchizophreniaR01MH080066 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GOLD, JAMES M. · 2008 to 2017
$6.4M
Neurocomputational and fMRI Studies of Motivational Deficits in SchizophreniaR01MH094460 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WALTZ, JAMES A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080066NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile many have emphasized impaired reward prediction error signaling in schizophrenia, multiple studies suggest that some decision-making deficits may arise from overreliance on stimulus-response systems together with a compromised ability to represent expected value. Guided by computational frameworks, we formulated and tested two scenarios in which maladaptive representations of expected value should be most evident, thereby delineating conditions that may evoke decision-making impairments in schizophrenia.

methodsIn a modified reinforcement learning paradigm, 42 medicated people with schizophrenia and 36 healthy volunteers learned to select the most frequently rewarded option in a 75-25 pair: once when presented with a more deterministic (90-10) pair and once when presented with a more probabilistic (60-40) pair. Novel and old combinations of choice options were presented in a subsequent transfer phase. Computational modeling was employed to elucidate contributions from stimulus-response systems (actor-critic) and expected value (Q-learning).

resultsPeople with schizophrenia showed robust performance impairments with increasing value difference between two competing options, which strongly correlated with decreased contributions from expected value-based learning (Q-learning). Moreover, a subtle yet consistent contextual choice bias for the probabilistic 75 option was present in people with schizophrenia, which could be accounted for by a context-dependent reward prediction error in the actor-critic.

conclusionsWe provide evidence that decision-making impairments in schizophrenia increase monotonically with demands placed on expected value computations. A contextual choice bias is consistent with overreliance on stimulus-response learning, which may signify a deficit secondary to the maladaptive representation of expected value. These results shed new light on conditions under which decision-making impairments may arise.

Indexed as

RewardAdultChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReinforcement, PsychologySchizophreniaComputational psychiatryDecision makingExpected valueMotivational deficitsReinforcement learningSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID29735404
PMCPMC8984835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.