Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29735014›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Value generalization in human avoidance learning.

Agnes Norbury, Trevor W Robbins, Ben Seymour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. VortioxetineCurrent neuropharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Agnes NorburyComputational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4377-3164
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ben SeymourComputational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1724-5832
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000183Versus Arthritis 21537Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097490/Z/11/AWellcome Trust 104631/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalization during aversive decision-making allows us to avoid a broad range of potential threats following experience with a limited set of exemplars. However, over-generalization, resulting in excessive and inappropriate avoidance, has been implicated in a variety of psychological disorders. Here, we use reinforcement learning modelling to dissect out different contributions to the generalization of instrumental avoidance in two groups of human volunteers (

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningGeneralization, PsychologicalBrainDecision MakingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaginganxiety disordersaversive learningavoidancegeneralizationhumanneuroscienceobsessive-compulsive disorderreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID29735014
PMCPMC5957527
OpenAlexW2771165717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.