ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2018
Public Willingness to Pay to Improve Services for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tale of Two Taxes: Implementation of Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health Services in California and Washington State.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Earmarked Taxes for Mental Health Services in the United States: A Local and State Legal Mapping Study.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- A policy implementation study of earmarked taxes for mental health services: study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Earmarked Taxes as a Policy Strategy to Increase Funding for Behavioral Health Services.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2020Article
- State Legislators' Support for Behavioral Health Parity Laws: The Influence of Mutable and Fixed Factors at Multiple Levels.The Milbank quarterly · 2019Article
- Portrayals of mental illness, treatment, and relapse and their effects on the stigma of mental illness: Population-based, randomized survey experiment in rural Uganda.PLoS medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study measured Americans' willingness to pay an additional $50 in taxes to improve health care and social services for individuals with serious mental illness.
methodsA nationally representative online survey was conducted with 1,010 respondents. Analysis examined how respondents' demographic characteristics and attitudes toward individuals with serious mental illness correlated with their willingness to pay additional taxes to improve health care and social services for this vulnerable population.
resultsA majority of respondents expressed willingness to pay $50 in additional taxes to improve health care services (60%) and social services (58%) for individuals with serious mental illness. Those with more negative attitudes toward individuals with serious mental illness were less willing to pay additional taxes to improve either service type.
conclusionsMany Americans are willing to pay additional taxes to improve health care and social services for individuals with serious mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.