Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29734759›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Trends in the Prevalences of Selected Birth Defects in Korea (2008⁻2014).

Jung-Keun Ko, Dirga Kumar Lamichhane, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Jong-Han Leem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Hypospadias Risk from Maternal Residential Exposure to Heavy Metal Hazardous Air Pollutants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jung-Keun KoDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea. ecokjk@naver.com.
Dirga Kumar LamichhaneDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea. dirgalamichhane@gmail.com.
Hwan-Cheol KimDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea. cheol17@hanmail.net.
Jong-Han LeemDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea. ekeeper21@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little information is available on the prevalences of birth defects in Korea. The aims of this study were to estimate recent prevalences of selected birth defects and to analyze the prevalence trends of these defects during the period from 2008 to 2014. Prevalences were calculated for 69 major birth defects using health insurance claim data obtained from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Prevalence rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression to analyze trends over the 7-year study period. The overall prevalence of a major birth defect was 446.3 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 444.0⁻448.6); 470.9 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 467.6⁻474.2) for males and 420.2 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 417⁻423.4) for females. The prevalence rates of the most common birth defects over the study period were; septal defect (138.2 per 10,000; 95% CI: 136.9⁻139.5), congenital hip dislocation (652 per 10,000; 95% CI: 64.1⁻65.9), and ventricular septal defect (62.62 per 10,000; 95% CI: 61.7⁻63.5). During the study period, a significant increase in the prevalence of a major birth defect was observed with a prevalence rate ratio (PRR) of 1.091. The strongest trend was observed for renal dysplasia, which had a PRR of 1.275 (95% CI: 1.211⁻1.343), and upward trends were observed for urogenital anomalies, such as, renal agenesis (PRR 1.102, 95% CI: 1.067⁻1.138), undescended testis (PRR 1.082, 95% CI: 1.072⁻1.093) and hypospadias (PRR 1.067, 95% CI: 1.044⁻1.090). This study shows an overall increase in the prevalences of birth defects, including hypospadias and undescended testis, which are known to be associated with endocrine factors. In the future, standardized birth defect registries should be established to enable these trends to be monitored.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInsurance Claim ReviewMalePrevalenceRegistriesRepublic of Koreabirth defectscongenital heart defectsprevalence rate ratiostrendsurogenital anomalies

Identifiers

PMID29734759
PMCPMC5981962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.