Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29734750›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2018

Cell-Penetrating Peptides to Enhance Delivery of Oligonucleotide-Based Therapeutics.

Graham McClorey, Subhashis Banerjee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03798587 (PNA-mediated Inhibition of the SENP1 Molecular Hub as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Suppression of Osteosarcoma Growth and Metastasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03798587 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

PNA-mediated Inhibition of the SENP1 Molecular Hub as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Suppression of Osteosarcoma Growth and Metastasis (PNA-OS)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorI.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioRan2020 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsPrimary Osteosarcoma of Bone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Novel Cell-Penetrating Lipopeptide for DNA Binding, Self-Assembly, and Delivery Into HeLa and Pluripotent Stem Cells.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Genetic therapies for neurological diseases.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham McCloreyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK. graham.mcclorey@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
Subhashis BanerjeeDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK. subhashis.banerjee@dpag.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of nucleic acid based oligonucleotides as effective genetic therapies has been held back by their low bioavailability and poor cellular uptake to target tissues upon systemic administration. One such strategy to improve upon delivery is the use of short cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) that can be either directly attached to their cargo through covalent linkages or through the formation of noncovalent nanoparticle complexes that can facilitate cellular uptake. In this review, we will highlight recent proof-of-principle studies that have utilized both of these strategies to improve nucleic acid delivery and discuss the prospects for translation of this approach for clinical application.

Indexed as

antisense oligonucleotidescell-penetrating peptidesdelivery

Identifiers

PMID29734750
PMCPMC6027240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.