Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29734724›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Plant⁻Microbe Interaction 2017-The Good, the Bad and the Diverse.

Jan Schirawski, Michael H Perlin

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microbial Biotechnology in Agriculture.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Dominance ofPeerJ · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan SchirawskiMicrobial Genetics, Institute of Applied Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany. jan.schirawski@rwth-aachen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-1201
Michael H PerlinDepartment of Biology, Program on Disease Resistance, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. michael.perlin@louisville.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5580-188X

Funding

WKU Lead Faculty AwardP20GM103436 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ERIC C ROUCHKA · 2012 to 2026
$60.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Of the many ways that plants interact with microbes, three aspects are highlighted in this issue: interactions where the plant benefits from the microbes, interactions where the plant suffers, and interactions where the plant serves as habitat for microbial communities. In this editorial, the fourteen articles published in the Special Issue Plant⁻Microbe Interaction 2017 are summarized and discussed as part of the global picture of the current understanding of plant-microbe interactions.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaPlantsRhodopsinStreptomycesTranscriptomeRhodopsincomparative methodseffectorsmicrobiomephytoremediationplant growth-promoting bacteriaplant–microbe interactionsrhodopsinsStreptomycestranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29734724
PMCPMC5983726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.