Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29733800›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2018

Comparison of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with voiding cystourethrography in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux.

Narsing Mane, Amit Sharma, Abhijit Patil, Chetan Gadekar, Mukund Andankar, Hemant Pathak

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738539 (Efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Urodynamic Studies), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04738539 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Urodynamic Studies

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled105ConditionsMyelomeningocele, Neurogenic Bladder, Tethered Cord Syndrome, Bladder, NeurogenicArmsContrast Enhanced Voiding Urosonography with Urodynamic Testing, Urodynamic Testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Diagnosis of Ectopic Ureters in Five Female Dogs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Contemporary Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Children.Current treatment options in pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Narsing ManeTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Amit SharmaTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Abhijit PatilTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Chetan GadekarTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Mukund AndankarTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Hemant PathakTNMC & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVoiding cystourethrography (VCUG) has been considered as the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). But, it requires fluoroscopic guidance which expose children to radiation. Voiding urosonography (VUS) is technically analogous to VCUG and has the major advantage of zero radiation exposure. This study aims to determine the efficacy of contrast enhanced-VUS (ce-VUS) with respect to VCUG in diagnosing VUR. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study involves 30 children over a period of 3 years. All patients underwent a VCUG followed by the ce-VUS on the same day. All VUS studies were done by the same sonologist in the sonography department. The images were recorded and reviewed by the same sonologist before reporting.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 51.53 months. There were 21 males and 9 females. On VCUG, 16 patients had no reflux, and 14 patients had reflux. On ce-VUS, 14 patients had no VUR, and 16 patients had VUR. Of the total 58 kidney-ureter units (KUUs), VUR was detected in 17 KUUs on VCUG and in 21 KUUs on ce-VUS. Thus, ce-VUS detected 4 refluxing units that were not seen on VCUG. In right KUUs, ce-VUS detected VUR in 3 units where no reflux was found in VCUG. In the 28 left KUUs, 25 units on ce-VUS showed concordance with the grade of VUR as detected by VCUG; 3 were discordant. Two units on ce-VUS showed a VUR one grade higher than the corresponding grade on VCUG and in one unit it was one grade lower. Thus, in total, ce-VUS picked up 4 cases which were missed by VCUG.

conclusionce-VUS is a good imaging modality when compared to voiding cystourethrography to assess pediatric vesicoureteral reflux, in view of its superior diagnostic performance, feasibility and radiation safety for children.

Identifiers

PMID29733800
PMCPMC5937646
OpenAlexW2798178653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.