ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2018
Views Of Primary Care Providers On Testing Patients For Genetic Risks For Common Chronic Diseases.
Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Pooled it
- Building capacity for genomics in primary care: a scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs, and enablers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- General practitioners' (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review.Family medicine and community health · 2022Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Testing and Disclosing Ancestry-Specific Genetic Risk for Kidney Failure on Patients and Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Genomic medicine knowledge, self-assessment, and training needs among Turkish pediatricians: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Non-genetic physicians' self-assessment of knowledge and confidence toward genetic testing and counseling: a national survey in a high consanguineous population.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and training on genetic testing among public health professionals and students in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Precision Medicine in Rural Settings: Patient Perspectives on Clinician-Ordered Genetic Testing.Research square · 2026Article
- Health care providers' perceptions of screening for risk of type 1 diabetes in newborns using genetic risk scores.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- North Carolina primary care provider perspectives on expanded genomic screening in children.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Case-based genomics education and training of neurologists: an Egyptian initiative.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Provider perceptions and insights on polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Self-assessed knowledge of genomic medicine among non-genetics physicians - results from a nationwide Swedish survey.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- The Impact of Research Results Feedback on the Lived Experiences of Elderly Participants in the DIMAMO Health Demographic Site: A Case of AWI-Gen Participants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.Research square · 2025Article
- Primary care patient and clinician attitudes about population genomic screening, informed decision-making needs, and the potential for Chatbot technology.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Qualitative assessment of primary care providers' attitudes toward genetic services and genetics education.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We surveyed 488 primary care providers in community and academic practices in New York City in the period 2014-16 about their views on genetic testing for chronic diseases. The majority of the providers, most of whom were current or recent physicians in training, had had formal genetics education and had positive views of the utility of genetic testing. However, they felt unprepared to work with patients at high risk for genetic conditions and were not confident about interpreting test results. Many were concerned that genetic testing might lead to insurance discrimination and lacked trust in companies that offer genetic tests. These findings point to some of the attitudes and knowledge gaps among the providers that should be considered in the clinical implementation of genomic medicine for chronic conditions. Enhanced training, guidelines, clinical tools, and awareness of patient protections might support the effective adoption of genomic medicine by primary care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.