Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29733375›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Tissue-selective restriction of RNA editing of CaV1.3 by splicing factor SRSF9.

Hua Huang, Katannya Kapeli, Wenhao Jin, Yuk Peng Wong, Thiruma Valavan Arumugam, Joanne Huifen Koh, Sumitra Srimasorn, Karthik Mallilankaraman, John Jia En Chua, Gene W Yeo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Inactivation of CaV1 and CaV2 channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Loss of CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Pan-Cancer Analysis RevealedJournal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hua HuangDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Katannya KapeliDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Wenhao JinDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Yuk Peng WongDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Thiruma Valavan ArumugamDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Joanne Huifen KohDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Sumitra SrimasornDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Karthik MallilankaramanDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
John Jia En ChuaDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Gene W YeoDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Tuck Wah SoongDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGNational Neuroscience Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine DeAminases acting on RNA (ADAR) catalyzes adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) conversion within RNA duplex structures. While A-to-I editing is often dynamically regulated in a spatial-temporal manner, the mechanisms underlying its tissue-selective restriction remain elusive. We have previously reported that transcripts of voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.3 are subject to brain-selective A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR2. Here, we show that editing of CaV1.3 mRNA is dependent on a 40 bp RNA duplex formed between exon 41 and an evolutionarily conserved editing site complementary sequence (ECS) located within the preceding intron. Heterologous expression of a mouse minigene that contained the ECS, intermediate intronic sequence and exon 41 with ADAR2 yielded robust editing. Interestingly, editing of CaV1.3 was potently inhibited by serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 9 (SRSF9). Mechanistically, the inhibitory effect of SRSF9 required direct RNA interaction. Selective down-regulation of SRSF9 in neurons provides a basis for the neuron-specific editing of CaV1.3 transcripts.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsBase SequenceCalcium Channels, L-TypeCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedGene Expression RegulationHEK293 CellsHumansKidneyMice, Inbred C57BLOrgan SpecificityRatsRNA-Binding ProteinsSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsADAR2 protein, mouseAdenosine DeaminaseCacna1d protein, mouseCalcium Channels, L-TypeRNA-Binding ProteinsSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsSfrs9 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID29733375
PMCPMC6101491
OpenAlexW2885475157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.