ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2018
Fourier-Domain Shift Matching: A Robust Time-of-Flight Approach for Shear Wave Speed Estimation.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Shear Wave Speed Assessment for Muscles With the Diagnosis of Taut Bands and/or Myofascial Trigger Points Using Probe Oscillation Shear Wave Elastography: A Pilot Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022Article
- Analyzing acoustoelastic effect of shear wave elastography data for perfused and hydrated soft tissues using a macromolecular network inspired model.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- A comparison of hyperelastic constitutive models applicable to shear wave elastography (SWE) data in tissue-mimicking materials.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our primary objective of this work was to design and test a new time-of-flight (TOF) method that allows measurements of shear wave speed (SWS) following impulsive excitation in soft tissues. Particularly, under the assumption of the local plane shear wave, this work named the Fourier-domain shift matching (FDSM) method, estimates SWS by aligning a series of shear waveforms either temporally or spatially using a solution space deduced by characteristic curves of the well-known 1-D wave equation. The proposed SWS estimation method was tested using computer-simulated data, and tissue-mimicking phantom and ex vivo tissue experiments. Its performance was then compared with three other known TOF methods: lateral time-to-peak (TTP) method with robust random sampling consensus (RANSAC) fitting method, Radon sum transformation method, and a modified cross correlation method. Hereafter, these three TOF methods are referred to as the TTP-RANSAC, Radon sum, and X-corr methods, respectively. In addition to an adapted form of the 2-D Fourier transform (2-D FT)-based method in which the (group) SWS was approximated by averaging phase SWS values was considered for comparison. Based on data evaluated, we found that the overall performance of the above-mentioned temporal implementation of the proposed FDSM method was most similar to the established Radon sum method (correlation = 0.99, scale factor = 1.03, and mean difference = 0.07 m/s), and the 2-D FT (correlation = 0.98, scale factor = 1.00, and mean difference = 0.10 m/s) at high signal quality. However, results obtained from the 2-D FT method diverged (correlation = 0.201) from these of the proposed temporal implementation in the presence of diminished signal quality, whereas the agreement between the Radon sum approach and the proposed temporal implementation largely remained the same (correlation = 0.98).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.