Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732475›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2018

Effects of acute NEFA manipulation on incretin-induced insulin secretion in participants with and without type 2 diabetes.

Brenno Astiarraga, Valéria B Chueire, Aglécio L Souza, Ricardo Pereira-Moreira, Sarah Monte Alegre, Andrea Natali, Andrea Tura, Andrea Mari, Ele Ferrannini, Elza Muscelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lipid regulation of the glucagon receptor family.The Journal of endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The diabetes pandemic and associated infections: suggestions for clinical microbiology.Reviews in medical microbiology : a journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brenno AstiarragaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Valéria B ChueireDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Aglécio L SouzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Ricardo Pereira-MoreiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Sarah Monte AlegreDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Andrea NataliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea TuraCNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.
Andrea MariCNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.
Ele FerranniniCNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Via Savi, 10, 56100, Pisa, Italy. ferranni@ifc.cnr.it.
Elza MuscelliDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisIncretin effect-the potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin release induced by the oral vs the i.v. route-is impaired in dysglycaemic states. Despite evidence from human islet studies that NEFA interfere with incretin function, little information is available about the effect in humans. We tested the impact of acute bidirectional NEFA manipulation on the incretin effect in humans.

methodsThirteen individuals with type 2 diabetes and ten non-diabetic volunteers had a 3 h OGTT, and, a week later, an i.v. isoglycaemic glucose infusion (ISO; OGTT matched). Both pairs of studies were repeated during an exogenous lipid infusion in the non-diabetic volunteers, and following acipimox administration (to inhibit lipolysis) in people with diabetes. Mathematical modelling of insulin secretion dynamics assessed total insulin secretion (TIS), beta cell glucose sensitivity (β-GS), glucose-induced potentiation (P

resultsLipid infusion increased TIS (from 61 [interquartile range 26] to 78 [31] nmol/m CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationRaising NEFA selectively impairs incretin effect and insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic individuals, while acute NEFA reduction lowers plasma glucose and enhances insulin sensitivity in people with diabetes but does not correct the impaired incretin-induced potentiation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fatty Acids, NonesterifiedGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucose Tolerance TestHumansIncretinsInsulinInsulin-Secreting CellsLipidsMiddle AgedPyrazinesacipimoxBlood GlucoseFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1IncretinsInsulinLipidsPyrazinesAcipimoxBeta cell functionIncretin effectIncretin hormonesIsoglycaemic protocolNEFAPotentiation

Identifiers

PMID29732475
OpenAlexW2799424068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.