Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732454›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Chemically Treated 3D Printed Polymer Scaffolds for Biomineral Formation.

Richard J Jackson, P Stephen Patrick, Kristopher Page, Michael J Powell, Mark F Lythgoe, Mark A Miodownik, Ivan P Parkin, Claire J Carmalt, Tammy L Kalber, Joseph C Bear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard J JacksonUCL Healthcare Biomagnetics Laboratory, The Royal Institution of Great Britain, 21 Albemarle Street, London W1S 4BS, U.K.
P Stephen PatrickCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging (CABI), Department of Medicine and Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, U.K.
Kristopher PageMaterials Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Michael J PowellMaterials Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Mark F LythgoeCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging (CABI), Department of Medicine and Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, U.K.
Mark A MiodownikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.
Ivan P ParkinMaterials Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Claire J CarmaltMaterials Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Tammy L KalberCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging (CABI), Department of Medicine and Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, U.K.
Joseph C BearSchool of Life Science, Pharmacy & Chemistry, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 2EE, U.K.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J013110/1Medical Research Council MR/K026739/1Medical Research Council MR/R026416/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the synthesis of nylon-12 scaffolds by 3D printing and demonstrate their versatility as matrices for cell growth, differentiation, and biomineral formation. We demonstrate that the porous nature of the printed parts makes them ideal for the direct incorporation of preformed nanomaterials or material precursors, leading to nanocomposites with very different properties and environments for cell growth. Additives such as those derived from sources such as tetraethyl orthosilicate applied at a low temperature promote successful cell growth, due partly to the high surface area of the porous matrix. The incorporation of presynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles led to a material that showed rapid heating in response to an applied ac magnetic field, an excellent property for use in gene expression and, with further improvement, chemical-free sterilization. These methods also avoid changing polymer feedstocks and contaminating or even damaging commonly used selective laser sintering printers. The chemically treated 3D printed matrices presented herein have great potential for use in addressing current issues surrounding bone grafting, implants, and skeletal repair, and a wide variety of possible incorporated material combinations could impact many other areas.

Identifiers

PMID29732454
PMCPMC5928486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.