Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732274›Full record

ArticleCurrent transplantation reports2017

Clinical Hepatocyte Transplantation: What Is Next?

James E Squires, Kyle A Soltys, Patrick McKiernan, Robert H Squires, Stephen C Strom, Ira J Fox, Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current transplantation reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Progress in basic and clinical and clinical research of a cell therapy for end-stage liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. End-stage liver failure: filling the treatment gap at the intensive care unit.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Review
  13. Frontiers in medical technology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James E SquiresDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Kyle A SoltysThomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Patrick McKiernanDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Robert H SquiresDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Stephen C StromKarolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ira J FoxDepartment of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, and McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alejandro Soto-GutierrezDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Hepatocyte xenografts for treatment of acute liver failureR01AI122369 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FOX, IRA J., PLATT, JEFFREY L · 2016 to 2020
$5.0M
Mini-Livers Derived from Human IPS Cells for Modeling Steatosis and TherapyR01DK099257 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NAGRATH, DEEPAK, SOTO-GUTIERREZ, ALEJANDRO · 2014 to 2024
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122369NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSignificant recent scientific developments have occurred in the field of liver repopulation and regeneration. While techniques to facilitate liver repopulation with donor hepatocytes and different cell sources have been studied extensively in the laboratory, in recent years clinical hepatocyte transplantation (HT) and liver repopulation trials have demonstrated new disease indications and also immunological challenges that will require the incorporation of a fresh look and new experimental approaches. RECENT

findingsGrowth advantage and regenerative stimulus are necessary to allow donor hepatocytes to proliferate. Current research efforts focus on mechanisms of donor hepatocyte expansion in response to liver injury/preconditioning. Moreover, latest clinical evidence shows that important obstacles to HT include optimizing engraftment and limited duration of effectiveness, with hepatocytes being lost to immunological rejection. We will discuss alternatives for cellular rejection monitoring, as well as new modalities to follow cellular graft function and near-to-clinical cell sources. SUMMARY: HT partially corrects genetic disorders for a limited period of time and has been associated with reversal of ALF. The main identified obstacles that remain to make HT a curative approach include improving engraftment rates, and methods for monitoring cellular graft function and rejection. This review aims to discuss current state-of-the-art in clinical HT and provide insights into innovative approaches taken to overcome these obstacles.

Indexed as

autologous hepatocyteshepatocyte rejection monitoringHepatocytesliver preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID29732274
PMCPMC5932623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.