Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732268›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences2018

Practical considerations for plant phylogenomics.

Michael R McKain, Matthew G Johnson, Simon Uribe-Convers, Deren Eaton, Ya Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofCurrent genomics · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael R McKainDepartment of Biological Sciences The University of Alabama Box 870344 Tuscaloosa Alabama 35487 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9091-306X
Matthew G JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University 2901 Main Street, Box 43131 Lubbock Texas 79409 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-6334
Simon Uribe-ConversDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan 830 North University Ann Arbor Michigan 48109 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-5713
Deren EatonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology Columbia University 1200 Amsterdam Avenue New York New York 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-2770
Ya YangDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology University of Minnesota-Twin Cities 1445 Gortner Avenue St. Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-0984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen a major breakthrough in our ability to easily and inexpensively sequence genome-scale data from diverse lineages. The development of high-throughput sequencing and long-read technologies has ushered in the era of phylogenomics, where hundreds to thousands of nuclear genes and whole organellar genomes are routinely used to reconstruct evolutionary relationships. As a result, understanding which options are best suited for a particular set of questions can be difficult, especially for those just starting in the field. Here, we review the most recent advances in plant phylogenomic methods and make recommendations for project-dependent best practices and considerations. We focus on the costs and benefits of different approaches in regard to the information they provide researchers and the questions they can address. We also highlight unique challenges and opportunities in plant systems, such as polyploidy, reticulate evolution, and the use of herbarium materials, identifying optimal methodologies for each. Finally, we draw attention to lingering challenges in the field of plant phylogenomics, such as reusability of data sets, and look at some up-and-coming technologies that may help propel the field even further.

Indexed as

genome skimmingmicrofluidicsphylogenomicsRAD‐seqsequence capturetranscriptomes

Identifiers

PMID29732268
PMCPMC5895195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.