Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732255›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences2018

Herbarium data: Global biodiversity and societal botanical needs for novel research.

Shelley A James, Pamela S Soltis, Lee Belbin, Arthur D Chapman, Gil Nelson, Deborah L Paul, Matthew Collins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Herbarium specimens reveal links betweenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shelley A JamesNational Herbarium of New South Wales Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Mrs Macquaries Road Sydney New South Wales 2000 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1105-1850
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.
Lee BelbinAtlas of Living Australia CSIRO Clunies Ross Street Acton Australia Capital Territory 2601 Australia.
Arthur D ChapmanAustralian Biodiversity Information Services Ballan Victoria 3342 Australia.
Gil NelsoniDigBio Florida State University Tallahassee Florida 32306 USA.
Deborah L PauliDigBio Florida State University Tallahassee Florida 32306 USA.
Matthew CollinsAdvanced Computing and Information Systems University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building on centuries of research based on herbarium specimens gathered through time and around the globe, a new era of discovery, synthesis, and prediction using digitized collections data has begun. This paper provides an overview of how aggregated, open access botanical and associated biological, environmental, and ecological data sets, from genes to the ecosystem, can be used to document the impacts of global change on communities, organisms, and society; predict future impacts; and help to drive the remediation of change. Advocacy for botanical collections and their expansion is needed, including ongoing digitization and online publishing. The addition of non-traditional digitized data fields, user annotation capability, and born-digital field data collection enables the rapid access of rich, digitally available data sets for research, education, informed decision-making, and other scholarly and creative activities. Researchers are receiving enormous benefits from data aggregators including the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio), the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), and the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), but effective collaboration around data infrastructures is needed when working with large and disparate data sets. Tools for data discovery, visualization, analysis, and skills training are increasingly important for inspiring novel research that improves the intrinsic value of physical and digital botanical collections.

Indexed as

biodiversity databiodiversity standardsglobal changeherbarium collectionsinformatics

Identifiers

PMID29732255
PMCPMC5851569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.