Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732253›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2018

Digitization protocol for scoring reproductive phenology from herbarium specimens of seed plants.

Jennifer M Yost, Patrick W Sweeney, Ed Gilbert, Gil Nelson, Robert Guralnick, Amanda S Gallinat, Elizabeth R Ellwood, Natalie Rossington, Charles G Willis, Stanley D Blum and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Jennifer M YostDepartment of Biological Sciences California Polytechnic State University 1 Grand Avenue San Luis Obispo California 93407 USA.
Patrick W SweeneyDivision of Botany Peabody Museum of Natural History Yale University P.O. Box 208118 New Haven Connecticut 06520 USA.
Ed GilbertArizona State University School of Life Sciences P.O. Box 874501 Tempe Arizona 85287-4501 USA.
Gil NelsoniDigBio College of Communication and Information Florida State University Tallahassee Florida 32306 USA.
Robert GuralnickFlorida Museum of Natural History and Biodiversity Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.
Amanda S GallinatBoston University Department of Biology 5 Cummington Mall Boston Massachusets 02215 USA.
Elizabeth R EllwoodLa Brea Tar Pits and Museum 5801 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles California 90036 USA.
Natalie RossingtonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology University of California Santa Barbara California 93106-9620 USA.
Charles G WillisDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 USA.
Stanley D BlumBiodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) 1342 34th Avenue San Francisco California 94122 USA.
Ramona L WallsCyVerse University of Arizona 1657 East Helen Street Tucson Arizona 85721 USA.
Elspeth M HastonRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20a Inverleith Row Edinburgh EH3 5LR United Kingdom.
Michael W DenslowFlorida Museum of Natural History and Biodiversity Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.
Constantin M ZohnerSystematic Botany and Mycology Department of Biology Munich University (LMU) 80638 Munich Germany.
Ashley B MorrisDepartment of Biology Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro Tennessee 37138 USA.
Brian J StuckyFlorida Museum of Natural History and Biodiversity Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.
J Richard CarterBiology Department Valdosta State University Valdosta Georgia 31698 USA.
David G BaxterUniversity and Jepson Herbaria University of California Berkeley 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building Berkeley California 94720 USA.
Kjell BolmgrenSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences Unit for Field-based Forest Research 360 30 Lammhult Sweden.
Ellen G DennyUSA National Phenology Network University of Arizona Tucson Arizona 85721 USA.
Ellen DeanUC Davis Center for Plant Diversity Plant Sciences M.S. 7, One Shields Avenue Davis California 95616 USA.
Katelin D PearsonDepartment of Biological Science Florida State University Tallahassee Florida 32304 USA.
Charles C DavisDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge Massachusetts 02138 USA.
Brent D MishlerUniversity and Jepson Herbaria University of California Berkeley 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building Berkeley California 94720 USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History and Biodiversity Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida 32611 USA.
Susan J MazerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology University of California Santa Barbara California 93106-9620 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studyHerbarium specimens provide a robust record of historical plant phenology (the timing of seasonal events such as flowering or fruiting). However, the difficulty of aggregating phenological data from specimens arises from a lack of standardized scoring methods and definitions for phenological states across the collections community. METHODS AND

resultsTo address this problem, we report on a consensus reached by an iDigBio working group of curators, researchers, and data standards experts regarding an efficient scoring protocol and a data-sharing protocol for reproductive traits available from herbarium specimens of seed plants. The phenological data sets generated can be shared via Darwin Core Archives using the Extended MeasurementOrFact extension.

conclusionsOur hope is that curators and others interested in collecting phenological trait data from specimens will use the recommendations presented here in current and future scoring efforts. New tools for scoring specimens are reviewed.

Indexed as

citizen sciencedigitization workflowsherbarium specimensontologyphenology

Identifiers

PMID29732253
PMCPMC5851559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.