ArticleCentral European journal of urology2018
Can the evolution of male contraception lead to a revolution? Review of the current state of knowledge.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGreat advances in medical research concerning methods of contraception have been achieved in recent years, however, more than 25% of couples worldwide still rely on condoms - a method with poor efficacy. Even though there is a spectrum of 11 different contraceptive methods for women, there are only 4 commonly used by men (condoms, periodic abstinence, withdrawal and vasectomy). In this review, advances and present, state-of-the-art, both hormonal and non-hormonal male contraceptive methods will be presented and evaluated. Potential novel targets that warrant greater research will be highlighted. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive literature search without a time limit was performed using the Medline database on May 2017. The terms 'male contraception' in conjunction with 'reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance' (RISUG), 'hormonal', 'non-hormonal', 'vasectomy' or 'testosterone' were used. The articles were limited to those published in English, Polish or French.
resultsThere are various contraceptives currently available to regulate male fertility. Vasectomy is still the most effective permanent form of male contraceptive with a failure rate lower than 1%. Reversible, non hormonal methods of male contraception, like reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance, are very promising and close to being introduced into the market. In regards to hormonal contraception research, the use of testosterone injections has been widely studied yet they often harbor undesirable side effects and require further development.
conclusionsDespite continuous efforts worldwide, it seems that another several years of research is needed to provide safe, effective and affordable male contraceptives which will allow both men and women to participate fully in family planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.