Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29732114›Full record

ReviewChemical science2018

Multicomponent mechanochemical synthesis.

Marco Leonardi, Mercedes Villacampa, J Carlos Menéndez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Non-Equilibrium Synthesis Methods to Create Metastable and High-Entropy Nanomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Amine-AlHChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Template and Solid-State-Assisted Assembly of an MJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco LeonardiUnidad de Química Orgánica y Farmacéutica , Departamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas , Facultad de Farmacia , Universidad Complutense , 28040 Madrid , Spain . Email: josecm@farm.ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7723-3633
Mercedes VillacampaUnidad de Química Orgánica y Farmacéutica , Departamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas , Facultad de Farmacia , Universidad Complutense , 28040 Madrid , Spain . Email: josecm@farm.ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-0747
J Carlos MenéndezUnidad de Química Orgánica y Farmacéutica , Departamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas , Facultad de Farmacia , Universidad Complutense , 28040 Madrid , Spain . Email: josecm@farm.ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-8416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, the use of mechanochemical methods in synthesis has been almost negligible, but their perception by the synthetic community has changed in recent years and they are on their way to becoming mainstream. However, the hybridization of mechanochemical synthesis with methodologies designed to increase synthetic efficiency by allowing the generation of several bonds in a single operation has taken off only recently, but it already constitutes a very promising approach to sustainable chemistry. In this context, we provide in this Perspective a critical summary and discussion of the main known synthetic methods based on mechanochemical multicomponent reactions.

Identifiers

PMID29732114
PMCPMC5909673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.