Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29731821›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018

Clinical significance of the detection of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the intensive care unit.

Qinhao Li, Xiaona Gong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of Serum Levels of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Prognostic Indicators in Burns.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qinhao LiIntensive Care Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University in Dongying, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Xiaona GongDepartment of Emergency, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University in Dongying, Dongying, Shandong 257000, P.R. China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification significance of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels in the intensive care unit patients with combined infection and their prognostic effects of patients with sepsis was investigated. A total of 203 patients were divided into the sepsis (n=60) and the non-sepsis group (n=143). The predictive effects of CRP and PCT levels in patients in the intensive care unit on sepsis and their effects on the prognosis of patients with sepsis were analyzed. The results showed that CRP and PCT levels in patients in the sepsis were higher than those in the non-sepsis group (P<0.05); CRP and PCT levels in patients who died of sepsis at 1 week and 2 weeks after admission were not statistically different to those before admission (P>0.05); CRP and PCT levels in patients surviving sepsis at 1 week after admission were significantly decreased compared with those at admission (P<0.05). CRP and PCT levels in patients at 2 weeks after admission were significantly decreased compared with those at admission (P<0.05). CRP and PCT levels in patients who died of sepsis were higher than those surviving sepsis (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the higher the CRP and PCT levels were, the worse the patients' conditions would be, and the higher the risk of death would be (r=0.732, P=0.012; r=0.826, P=0.007); besides, PCT had a higher value in predicting the poor prognosis of patients [PCT: Area under the curve (AUC)=0.734, CRP: AUC=0.699]; the univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CRP, PCT and age may be the risk factors for poor prognosis in patients. CRP and PCT can be used to identify whether the patients in the intensive care unit are infected or not. The dynamic monitoring of CRP and PCT has important clinical significance in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

clinical significanceC-reactive proteinintensive care unitprocalcitoninsepsis

Identifiers

PMID29731821
PMCPMC5921035
OpenAlexW2790054326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.