ArticlePublic health ethics2017
Global Health Solidarity.
Article in Public health ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perceived need and help-seeking for psychosocial support among health and social care professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Non-complicity as a principle of public health ethics.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- Instituting solidarity: the role of research institutes in advancing global health equity.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Why we must face our past: reconciliatory solidarity for global health ethics.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Understandings and practices of solidarity in global health: a scoping review of the literature.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Beyond Good and Bad: Rethinking Solidarity and Coercion in Public Health.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026Article
- Global Health Solidarity: A Multidimensional Framework.Bioethics · 2026Article
- Meanings and practices of solidarity in global health: a qualitative investigation - study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Scarce resources, public health and professional care: the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating bioethical conflicts - findings from global qualitative expert interviews.BMC public health · 2023Article
- How to Design Consent for Health Data Research? An Analysis of Arguments of Solidarity.Public health ethics · 2023Article
- Newspaper coverage on solidarity and personal responsibility in the COVID-19 pandemic: A content analysis from Germany and German-speaking Switzerland.SSM - population health · 2023Article
- Assessing health governance across countries: a scoping review protocol on indices and assessment tools applied globally.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Pandemic Risk and Standpoint Epistemology: A Matter of Solidarity.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022Article
- Articulations of antimicrobial resistance in trade union financed journals for nurses in Scandinavia - A Foucauldian perspective.Nursing inquiry · 2021Article
- Flashing red lights: the global implications of COVID-19 vaccination passports.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Does the COVID-19 pandemic threaten global solidarity? Evidence from Germany.World development · 2021Article
- Relational solidarity and COVID-19: an ethical approach to disrupt the global health disparity pathway.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2021Article
- Solidarity and polarisation regarding COVID-19 and related risks - A thematic analysis of comments from an international survey.Social sciences & humanities open · 2021Article
- A Global Ecological Ethic for Human Health Resources.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020Article
- Pandemic Surveillance and Racialized Subpopulations: Mitigating Vulnerabilities in COVID-19 Apps.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For much of the 20th century, vulnerability to deprivations of health has often been defined by geographical and economic factors. Those in wealthy, usually 'Northern' and 'Western', parts of the world have benefited from infrastructures, and accidents of geography and climate, which insulate them from many serious threats to health. Conversely, poorer people are typically exposed to more threats to health, and have lesser access to the infrastructures needed to safeguard them against the worst consequences of such exposure. However, in recent years the increasingly globalized nature of the world's economy, society and culture, combined with anthropogenic climate change and the evolution of antibiotic resistance, has begun to shift the boundaries that previously defined the categories of person threatened by many exogenous threats to health. In doing so, these factors expose both new and forgotten similarities between persons, and highlight the need for global cooperative responses to the existential threats posed by climate change and the evolution of antimicrobial resistance. In this article, we argue that these emerging health threats, in demonstrating the similarities that exist between even distant persons, provides a catalyst for global solidarity, which justifies, and provides motivation for, the establishment of solidaristic, cooperative global health infrastructures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.