Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29731754›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

The Emerging Complexity of γδT17 Cells.

Duncan R McKenzie, Iain Comerford, Bruno Silva-Santos, Shaun R McColl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Innate Lymphocytes in Psoriasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Duncan R McKenzieDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Iain ComerfordDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Bruno Silva-SantosFaculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Shaun R McCollDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

European Research Council 646701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprogrammed IL-17-producing γδ T cells constitute a poorly understood class of lymphocytes that express rearranged antigen receptors but appear to make little use of them. γδT17 cells were first characterized as tissue-resident sentinels with innate effector function. However, ongoing research continues to reveal unexpected complexity to this unusual subset, including phenotypic plasticity, memory-like activity and unique migratory behavior. Despite these advances, at the core of γδT17 cell biology remain fundamental gaps in knowledge: Are γδT17 cells truly innate or has the importance of the T cell receptor been overlooked? How unique are they among IL-17-producing lymphocytes? How similar are these cells between mice and humans? We speculate that answering these unresolved questions is key to successful manipulation of γδ T cells in clinical settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansInterleukin-17MiceReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaTh17 CellsInterleukin-17Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaIL-17immunological memorymigrationplasticityT cell receptor signalingtranslationγδ T cells

Identifiers

PMID29731754
PMCPMC5919943
OpenAlexW2802509439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.