ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2018
Parallel detection in a single ICR cell: Spectral averaging and improved S/N without increased acquisition time.
Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A high-resolution circulating metabolic atlas of lung adenocarcinoma progression supports early and accurate diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- A planar quadrupole device for transmitting and trapping ions in high vacuum.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2023Article
- Application of frequency multiple FT-ICR-MS signal acquisition for improved proteome research.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2021Article
- Parallel Detection of Fundamental and Sixth Harmonic Signals Using an ICR Cell with Dipole and Sixth Harmonic Detectors.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-MS) is well-renowned for its ultrahigh resolving power and mass measurement accuracy. As with other types of analytical instrumentation, achievable signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) is an important analytical figure of merit with FTICR-MS. S/N can be improved with higher magnetic fields and longer time-domain signal acquisition periods. However, serial signal averaging of spectra or time-domain signals acquired with multiple ion populations is most commonly used to improve S/N. On the other hand, serial acquisition and averaging of multiple scans significantly increases required data acquisition time and is often incompatible with on-line chromatographic separations. In this study, we investigated the potential for increased S/N by averaging 4 spectra that were acquired in parallel with a single ICR cell with 4 pairs of dipole detection electrodes, each with an independent pre-amplifier. This spectral averaging was achieved with no need for multiple ion accumulation events nor multiple, serial excitation and detection events. These efforts demonstrated that parallel signal acquisition with 4 detector electrode pairs produces S/N 1.76-fold higher than that from a single detection electrode pair. With parallel detection, improved S/N was achieved with no observable loss in resolving power (100,000) as compared with that from a single detection electrode pair. These results demonstrate that parallel detection of multiple induced image current signals with multiple preamplifiers exists as a viable option for future instrumentation to increase achievable S/N and sensitivity. This approach may have general utility especially where conventional serial signal averaging is impractical.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.