ArticleInfection and drug resistance2018
A prospective cohort study of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Neonatal Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Walking the walk to include pregnant participants in non-obstetric clinical trials: Insights from the SNAP Trial.Obstetric medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-NegativeThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2021Article
- Colonization Rate of Potential Neonatal Disease-Causing Bacteria, Associated Factors, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile Among Pregnant Women Attending Government Hospitals in Hawassa, Ethiopia.Infection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Article
- Prevalence, risk factors, phenotypic and molecular characteristics for Staphylococcus aureus carriage in community-based drug users in Guangzhou, China.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020Article
- Environmental Contamination Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Community-AssociatedInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in neonates on admission to a Chinese neonatal intensive care unit.PloS one · 2020Article
- Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Carriage of the Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin Gene by Contemporary Community-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2019Article
- Comparison of risk factors for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in healthy newborns, born to mothers with and without MRSA colonization.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted between August and November 2015 in two hospitals in Shenzhen, China. Chinese pregnant women and their neonates who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study; samples and relevant information were collected. We assessed maternal-neonatal associations by using Poisson regression models.
resultsOverall, 1834 mothers and their neonates were included in this study. The prevalence of isolate carriage among the mothers was as follows:
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.