Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29731610›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

Treatment adherence among adult hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional retrospective study in primary care in Romania.

Ioan Tilea, Dorina Petra, Septimiu Voidazan, Elena Ardeleanu, Andreea Varga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Weekend Effect and Mortality Outcomes in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessment of suicidal behavior in dermatology (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioan TileaDepartment M3-Internal Medicine, Family Medicine Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Mures, Romania.
Dorina PetraDepartment M3-Internal Medicine, Family Medicine Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Mures, Romania.
Septimiu VoidazanDepartment M2-Functional and Complementary Sciences, Epidemiology Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Mures, Romania.
Elena ArdeleanuDepartment XVI-Balneology, Medical Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Family Medicine Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Timis, Romania.
Andreea VargaDepartment M3-Internal Medicine, Family Medicine Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Mures, Romania.
Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș · ROWest University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to elucidate the level of adherence to antihypertensive treatment in adult subjects attending a family medicine clinic in a city in central Romania. PATIENTS AND

methodsA cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed on a cohort of hypertensive adults. A total of 525 participants were selected from 1,714 adults attending a single urban family medicine practice. Assessment of adherence to therapy was performed by a chart review of prescription and clinical records over a 4-year study period.

resultsThe results showed that 69.8% of the patients had high adherence (>80% with therapy); 20.3% had medium adherence (20%-79%); and 9.9% had low adherence (<20%). A positive association was found (

conclusionThis is the first published study assessing adherence to antihypertensive therapy in family medicine practice in Romania. It presented data derived from a primarily urban setting and targeted a geographical area where the prevalence of hypertension has increased continuously. Female gender, age, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, defined cardiovascular disease, chronic renal impairment, and good control of hypertension were positively associated with high adherence. The results provide insights to guide further strategies to improve adherence and indirect methods for blood pressure management strategies.

Indexed as

blood pressureEastern Europefamily medicinehypertensionprescription

Identifiers

PMID29731610
PMCPMC5923249
OpenAlexW2800890838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.