Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29731395›Full record

ReviewCancer cell2018

CDK4/6 Inhibitors: The Mechanism of Action May Not Be as Simple as Once Thought.

Mary E Klein, Marta Kovatcheva, Lara E Davis, William D Tap, Andrew Koff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 236 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
236citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

236 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Next-generation CDK inhibitors in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary E KleinThe Louis V. Gerstner Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and the Sloan Kettering Institute Program in Molecular Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, RRL917C, Box 207, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Marta KovatchevaThe Louis V. Gerstner Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and the Sloan Kettering Institute Program in Molecular Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, RRL917C, Box 207, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Lara E DavisKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
William D TapDepartments of Medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the Weill Cornell College of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Andrew KoffThe Louis V. Gerstner Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and the Sloan Kettering Institute Program in Molecular Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, RRL917C, Box 207, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: koffa@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE in Soft Tissue SarcomaP50CA140146 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SPRIGGS, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CDK4/6 inhibitors are among a new generation of therapeutics. Building upon the striking success of the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and the hormone receptor antagonist letrozole in breast cancer, many other combinations have recently entered clinical trials in multiple diseases. To achieve maximal benefit with CDK4/6 inhibitors it will be critical to understand the cellular mechanisms by which they act. Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest, and discuss how this knowledge may inform new combinations, improve outcomes, and modify dosing schedules in the future.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6HumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsabemaciclibCDK4/6 inhibitorsmetabolismpalbociclibribociclibsenescencetumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29731395
PMCPMC6039233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.