ArticleLa Radiologia medica2018
Technical and clinical feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of long bone non-infected nonunion healing.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Long-Bone Delayed Union and Nonunion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.La Radiologia medica · 2020Pooled it
- Experimental study on the effect of warm acupuncture on the healing of bone nonunion in rats.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided cellular therapy: Current applications and future directions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Bone Healing Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Non-Operative Treatment of Tibial Fracture in a Puppy Dog.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Surgical margin follow-up after nephron-sparing surgery: the possible role of CEUS.Journal of ultrasound · 2020Article
- Systematic review assessing the evidence for the use of stem cells in fracture healing.Bone & joint open · 2020Article
- Ultrasound of iliotibial band syndrome.Journal of ultrasound · 2020Review
- Update of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Clinical Perspectives - A Review.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the technical feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the monitoring of non-infected long bone nonunion healing.
methodsTwenty-five patients (16 males; mean age: 40.4 ± 11.7) with long bone nonunion were treated using surgery and mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma. They performed CEUS up to 15 days before, 7 days, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. To categorize the angiogenesis around the fracture site, the microvascular blood flow from CEUS was classified into four categories, depending on the portion of the investigated area that was involved in the neovascularization process: grade 0 = 0%; grade 1 = 0-30%; grade 2 = 30-70%; grade 3 = 70-100%. Nonparametric Friedman and Wilcoxon statistics were used.
resultsBefore treatment, neovascularization was graded as 0 in 15/25 patients, as 1 in 10/25. Vascularity significantly increased over time (P < 0.001), namely: 1 (25th-75th percentile = 1-2) at 7 days; 2 (1-2) at 4 weeks; 3 (0-2) at 8 weeks. All patients but one showed early progressive increase in neovascularization well identified with CEUS at the fracture site.
conclusionCEUS is a feasible method to monitor healing in patients with long bone nonunion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29730840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.