Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29730774›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2018

In-flight cardiac arrest and in-flight cardiopulmonary resuscitation during commercial air travel: consensus statement and supplementary treatment guideline from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM).

Jochen Hinkelbein, Lennert Böhm, Stefan Braunecker, Harald V Genzwürker, Steffen Kalina, Fabrizio Cirillo, Matthieu Komorowski, Andreas Hohn, Jörg Siedenburg, Michael Bernhard and 9 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jochen HinkelbeinWorking group "guidelines, recommendations, and statements", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany. jochen.hinkelbein@uk-koeln.de.
Lennert BöhmEmergency Department, University of Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan BrauneckerWorking group "guidelines, recommendations, and statements", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Harald V GenzwürkerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Neckar-Odenwald-Kliniken, Mosbach, Germany.
Steffen KalinaWorking group "emergency medicine and air rescue", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Fabrizio CirilloDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Matthieu KomorowskiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andreas HohnDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jörg Siedenburg, Uetersen, Germany.
Michael BernhardEmergency Department, University of Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ilse JanickeWorking group "emergency medicine and air rescue", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Christoph AdlerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Heart Center of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefanie JansenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Eckard GlaserWorking group "guidelines, recommendations, and statements", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Pawel KrawczykDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Mirko MiesenYourCockpit Flight Simulator, Cologne, Germany.
Janusz AndresDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Edoardo De RobertisDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Christopher NeuhausWorking group "guidelines, recommendations, and statements", German Society of Aviation and Space Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By the end of the year 2016, approximately 3 billion people worldwide travelled by commercial air transport. Between 1 out of 14,000 and 1 out of 50,000 passengers will experience acute medical problems/emergencies during a flight (i.e., in-flight medical emergency). Cardiac arrest accounts for 0.3% of all in-flight medical emergencies. So far, no specific guideline exists for the management and treatment of in-flight cardiac arrest (IFCA). A task force with clinical and investigational expertise in aviation, aviation medicine, and emergency medicine was created to develop a consensus based on scientific evidence and compiled a guideline for the management and treatment of in-flight cardiac arrests. Using the GRADE, RAND, and DELPHI methods, a systematic literature search was performed in PubMed. Specific recommendations have been developed for the treatment of IFCA. A total of 29 specific recommendations for the treatment and management of in-flight cardiac arrests were generated. The main recommendations included emergency equipments as well as communication of the emergency. Training of the crew is of utmost importance, and should ideally have a focus on CPR in aircraft. The decision for a diversion should be considered very carefully.

Indexed as

Air TravelAerospace MedicineAircraftCardiopulmonary ResuscitationConsensusGermanyGuidelines as TopicHumansOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAEDAirplaneBLSCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationCPRIn-flight medical emergencies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.