Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29730767›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Seed coat thickness in the evolution of angiosperms.

Olivier Coen, Enrico Magnani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A natural mutation of theHorticulture research · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Anatomy and Histochemistry of Seed Coat Development of Wild (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Comparative Analysis of the YABBY Gene Family ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier CoenInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRA, AgroParisTech, CNRS, University of Paris-Saclay, Route de St-Cyr (RD10), 78026, Versailles Cedex, France.
Enrico MagnaniInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRA, AgroParisTech, CNRS, University of Paris-Saclay, Route de St-Cyr (RD10), 78026, Versailles Cedex, France. enrico.magnani@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2959-3714
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG Marie Skłodowska SEEDNET EU-CIG no. 321710Labex Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The seed habit represents a remarkable evolutionary advance in plant sexual reproduction. Since the Paleozoic, seeds carry a seed coat that protects, nourishes and facilitates the dispersal of the fertilization product(s). The seed coat architecture evolved to adapt to different environments and reproductive strategies in part by modifying its thickness. Here, we review the great natural diversity observed in seed coat thickness among angiosperms and its molecular regulation in Arabidopsis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantArabidopsisGenes, PlantMagnoliopsidaModels, GeneticMutationSeedsFertilizationIntegumentOvuleSeed coatSeed coat thicknessSeed evolutionSeed maternal tissues

Identifiers

PMID29730767
PMCPMC6003975
OpenAlexW2800193980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.