Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29730721›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2018

Comparing the DSM-5 construct of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and ICD-10 Mixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct in the UK Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (UK-LAMS) Study.

I Sagar-Ouriaghli, G Milavic, R Barton, N Heaney, F Fiori, K Lievesley, J Singh, Paramala Santosh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Focused issue on conduct disorder and aggressive behaviour.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I Sagar-OuriaghliDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
G MilavicSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R BartonSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
N HeaneyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
F FioriDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
K LievesleyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
J SinghDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Paramala SantoshDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. paramala.1.santosh@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-5893
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Maudsley Hospital Charity 626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to understand new diagnostic entities in classifications of psychopathology such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) (code F34.8) construct of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) and to compare it with possible equivalent disorders in other classificatory systems such as the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10), which has a category that superficially appears similar, that is, Mixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct (MDEC) (code F92). In this study, the United Kingdom (UK) arm (UK-LAMS) of the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) supported Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) multi-site study was used to evaluate and retrospectively construct DMDD and MDEC diagnoses in order to compare them and understand the conditions they co-occur with, in order to improve the clinical understanding. In particular, the phenomenology of UK-LAMS participants (n = 117) was used to determine whether DMDD is a unique entity within the DSM-5. The findings showed that 24 of 68 participants with either DMDD or MDEC (35.3%) fulfilled both diagnostic criteria for DMDD and MDEC, suggesting that these entities do contain overlapping features, particularly symptoms relating to Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)/Conduct Disorder (CD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)/Hyperkinetic Disorder (HKD) and/or an anxiety disorder. The data also showed that most of the participants who met DMDD criteria also fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ODD/CD, ADHD, followed by an anxiety disorder. In this context, this raises the issue whether DMDD is a unique construct or whether the symptomology for DMDD can be better explained as a specifier for ODD/CD and ADHD. Unlike DMDD, MDEC clearly specifies that the label should only be used if emotional and conduct disorders co-exist.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAffective SymptomsBipolar DisorderChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMood DisordersProspective StudiesPsychopathologyUnited KingdomDisruptive Mood Dysregulation DisorderDSM-5ICD-10LAMSLongitudinal Assessment of Manic SymptomsMixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct

Identifiers

PMID29730721
PMCPMC6133106
OpenAlexW2801668625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.