Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29730494›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Brain extraction from normal and pathological images: A joint PCA/Image-Reconstruction approach.

Xu Han, Roland Kwitt, Stephen Aylward, Spyridon Bakas, Bjoern Menze, Alexander Asturias, Paul Vespa, John Van Horn, Marc Niethammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Deep Network for Joint Registration and Reconstruction of Images with Pathologies.Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xu HanDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address: xhs400@cs.unc.edu.
Roland KwittDepartment of Computer Science, University of Salzburg, Austria.
Stephen AylwardKitware Inc., USA.
Spyridon BakasCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Bjoern MenzeDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Alexander AsturiasInstitute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California, USA.
Paul VespaDavid Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, USA.
John Van HornInstitute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California, USA.
Marc NiethammerDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

Cancer imaging phenomics software suite: application to brain and breast cancerU24CA189523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
Multimodality Image-Based Assessment System for Traumatic Brain InjuryR44NS081792 · NINDS · KITWARE, INC. · PI AYLWARD, STEPHEN R, NIETHAMMER, MARC · 2015 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA189523NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS081792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain extraction from 3D medical images is a common pre-processing step. A variety of approaches exist, but they are frequently only designed to perform brain extraction from images without strong pathologies. Extracting the brain from images exhibiting strong pathologies, for example, the presence of a brain tumor or of a traumatic brain injury (TBI), is challenging. In such cases, tissue appearance may substantially deviate from normal tissue appearance and hence violates algorithmic assumptions for standard approaches to brain extraction; consequently, the brain may not be correctly extracted. This paper proposes a brain extraction approach which can explicitly account for pathologies by jointly modeling normal tissue appearance and pathologies. Specifically, our model uses a three-part image decomposition: (1) normal tissue appearance is captured by principal component analysis (PCA), (2) pathologies are captured via a total variation term, and (3) the skull and surrounding tissue is captured by a sparsity term. Due to its convexity, the resulting decomposition model allows for efficient optimization. Decomposition and image registration steps are alternated to allow statistical modeling of normal tissue appearance in a fixed atlas coordinate system. As a beneficial side effect, the decomposition model allows for the identification of potentially pathological areas and the reconstruction of a quasi-normal image in atlas space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on four datasets: the publicly available IBSR and LPBA40 datasets which show normal image appearance, the BRATS dataset containing images with brain tumors, and a dataset containing clinical TBI images. We compare the performance with other popular brain extraction models: ROBEX, BEaST, MASS, BET, BSE and a recently proposed deep learning approach. Our model performs better than these competing approaches on all four datasets. Specifically, our model achieves the best median (97.11) and mean (96.88) Dice scores over all datasets. The two best performing competitors, ROBEX and MASS, achieve scores of 96.23/95.62 and 96.67/94.25 respectively. Hence, our approach is an effective method for high quality brain extraction for a wide variety of images.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPrincipal Component AnalysisBrain extractionImage registrationPathologyPCATotal-variation

Identifiers

PMID29730494
PMCPMC6036616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.